A Thin Line Between Love and Hate: When is There Money in Your Subro Case?

One of the marks of a successful subrogation professional is knowing that line between a case being a closer versus having recovery potential. In this episode of Subro on the Go, David Brisco, Kris Cherevas, and Dana Meyers discuss challenging claims case examples and the important rules and guidelines that help subro specialists determine if a case has recovery potential.

About The Authors

Previous PostContractual Breach: Are Business Interruption Losses and Lost Profits Recoverable as Direct Damages in Canada?Next PostThe Latest California Court of Appeals Decision Further Clarifies Product Defect Claims Under The Right to Repair Act

David D. Brisco

David Brisco is a Member of Cozen O'Connor's Subrogation & Recovery practice group in the Litigation Department. He joined the San Diego office in 2005, and has been a Member since 2012. He is responsible for managing a subrogation litigation caseload in various legal areas, including product liability, negligence, construction defect, and breach of warranties.